韓国ドラマ『血も涙もなく〜ディア・マイ・シスター〜』にでているキャストや相関図のご紹介★
血も涙もなく〜ディア・マイ・シスター〜登場人物の名前など気になったりすることもあるかと思います
どんなキャストが出ているのか、相関図、ストーリーなどご紹介していきます！
韓国ドラマ 血も涙もなく〜ディア・マイ・シスター〜のご紹介★
引用元：https://www.kbsworld.ne.jp/
予告動画
放送予定
- BS Japanext（BS10）
1月21日（火）ひる12:00
あらすじ
幼い頃、おそろいのイニシャル入りのペンダントを身に付け、ずっと一緒にいようと誓った姉ヘウォン(イ・ソヨン)と妹ヘジ(ハ・ヨンジュ)だったが、両親の離婚により2人は別々の道を歩むことに。父親についていくはずだったヘジは、別れる直前に放ったヘウォンのある一言で母親についていくことを決める。しかし育児を放棄した母親のせいで、散々な生活を送ることになったヘジは、いつしかヘウォンへの憎しみが膨らませるのだった。ヘジはペ・ドウンに改名し 、成功した人生を送るべくＹＪグループ会長イチョル(チョン・チャン)に近づく。無事に愛人の座を手に入れたドウンだったが、ある日イチョルの息子ジチャン(チャン・セヒョン)の婚約者に出会うことに。するとその婚約者がヘウォンとおそろいのペンダントをしていたのだった。ジチャンの婚約者が生き別れた姉のヘウォンだと分かったドウンは、自分の人生をめちゃくちゃにした原因であるヘウォンに対し復讐を始めることに…。
相関図
引用元：出典：ワウコリア
31日間無料トライアルができます☆
血も涙もなく キャスト
＜役名＞イ・ヘウォン（俳優名）イ・ソヨン
チュダン芸術財団の総括チーム長
<役名>イ・ヘジ/ペ・ドウン（俳優名）ハ・ヨンジュ
ヘウォンの実の妹
<役名>ペク・ソンユン（俳優名）オ・チャンソク
人権派弁護士
<役名>ユン・ジチャン（俳優名）チャン・セヒョン
YJグループの海外開発チーム長
<役名>ユン・イチョル（俳優名）チョン・チャン
YJグループの会長
ジチャンの父親
<役名>イ・サンドゥル（俳優名）パク・シヌ
ヘウォンの義理
ジチャンの友人
<役名>オ・スヒャン（俳優名） ヤン・ヘジン
イチョルの元妻
ジュダン芸術財団理事長
<役名>キム・ミョンエ（俳優名）チョン・ヘソン
ジチャンの祖母
イチョルの母
YJグループ名誉会長
<役名> ユン・イラ（俳優名）チョン・スヨン
イチョルの妹
YJグループ理事
<役名>ピ・ヨンジュ（俳優名）ユン・ボギン
<役名>ペ・ジャングン（俳優名）カン・ソンジン
その他のキャスト
- イ・ミンテ→（演）ユ・テウン
- イ・ミンスク→（演）キム・イェリョン
- キム・ソンギョン→（演） ユ・ジヨン
コメント
Now considering whether the post would translate well into a different form, and a look at zorivohold suggested similar versatility, content that could move into other media without losing its substance is content that has been built around ideas rather than around format and this site reads as idea first throughout posts.
Reading this in a quiet coffee shop matched the calm energy of the writing, and a stop at kavionline extended that environmental match, content that has its own ambient quality which can match or clash with surroundings is content with a personality and this site has the kind of personality that suits calm reading.
Found the use of subheadings really helpful for scanning back through the post later, and a stop at customerfirstshoppinghub kept that reader friendly approach going, navigation is something many blog writers ignore but small structural choices make a noticeable difference for someone returning to find a specific point again days or weeks later.
Reading this in pieces over a coffee break and finding it consistently rewarding, and a stop at modernpurchaseplatform extended that into related material I will return to later, the kind of site that fits naturally into small reading windows without requiring a long uninterrupted block is genuinely useful for how I actually browse.
Right — been using this thing for about five months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d say something since a mate asked me a few days back. I’m in the UK, generally stick to footie and the horses, a fiver here and there, for context.
The reason I started using it was genuinely a bit daft — I never could get my head round what an ew payout actually was with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just guess and get a shock. Now type the odds in before every slip, even a simple single bet.
Their single bet calculator is the bit I open most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it shows the return straight away, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, and that’s where I always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/matched-betting]matched betting automatcher[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.
The thing that actually shifted things for me was the nerdier extras. There’s an implied probability converter which shows you the overround, and there’s the kelly criterion tool — I use half kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutching one is handy too when I’m spreading across selections.
It’s not perfect mind. Its layout is a bit basic — zero polish, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. Phone-wise it’s fine though the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. And no app, just the site — slight shame but worth saying.
Anyway. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does what it says. Anyone who even now adds it up in their head, give it a go — saved me a load of arguments with the bookie.
Just want to recognise that someone clearly cared about how this turned out, and a look at qorivotrustco confirmed that care extends across the broader site, you can feel the difference between content shipped to hit a deadline and content released because the writer was actually proud of the result for once.
Genuine reaction is that this site clicked with how I like to read, and a look at nolaroline kept that comfortable fit going, sometimes you find a place online whose editorial decisions just align with your preferences and when that happens it is worth recognising and supporting through repeat engagement consistently going forward.
If a friend asked me where to read carefully on the topic I would send them here without hesitation, and a look at thesandiegoleague confirmed the recommendation strength, the directness of my recommendation reflects how confident I am in the quality and this site has earned undiluted recommendations from me across multiple recent conversations actually.
Thanks for the breakdown, it gave me a clearer picture of something I had been confused about for a while now, and a stop at qorivobonding closed the remaining gaps in my understanding nicely, no need to hunt around twenty other articles to put the pieces together which is a real time saver.
Walked away in a slightly better mood than when I started reading, that says something about the writing, and a stop at cavaroline kept that going, content that leaves you feeling more capable rather than overwhelmed is the kind I keep coming back to again and again over the years and across many topics.
Ya llevo un par de meses en 888starz y la verdad tenia dudas al principio, ya que aqui en Espana te cansas de paginas que venden humo. El registro fue cosa de un rato minimo, los datos basicos y fuera, y el deposito minimo es de unos pocos euros, que para probar viene de lujo.
De tragaperras van sobrados — hablamos de unos 10.000 titulos de proveedores como Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Play’n GO, Betsoft y Yggdrasil. Yo me quedo en Gates of Olympus y Sweet Bonanza, eso si de vez en cuando pruebo los Megaways. Lo que me raya es que el buscador va un poco lento cuando el catalogo es tan bestia.
La zona en vivo esta llevada por Evolution y ahi no hay queja: mesas con crupier en espanol, Crazy Time y Monopoly Live que enganchan una barbaridad. La oferta de entrada va sobre el 130% y unas 150 giros, con un rollover de unas 35 veces, que no es regalado pero tampoco un robo. Tambien hay algun free spin sin deposito, puedes mirar lo que hay vigente directamente en [url=https://888starz-es6.com/no-deposit-bonus]888starz no deposit bonus code[/url] antes de meter dinero.
Los cobros va bastante fino. Saque hace poco con Skrill y entro casi al momento. Con tarjeta hay que esperar unos dias, eso ya es cosa del banco. Tienen Neteller, Bitcoin y USDT que es lo mas rapido con diferencia.
El movil funciona bien, tienen app para Android pero yo uso el navegador y me sobra. El soporte esta en espanol, me atendieron rapido cuando pregunte por el KYC. La licencia es de Curazao, no esta regulado por la DGOJ espanola y eso cada uno que lo valore. Por ahora no me ha fallado, pero ojo con el rollover de las promos.
Bookmark earned, calendar reminder set, share queued, all from one good post, and a look at xelariounion did the same, when a single reading session triggers multiple downstream actions you know the content has actually moved me beyond the page and this site is moving me at that higher level reliably.
A small thank you note from me to the team behind this work, the post earned it, and a stop at navirobond suggested more thanks would be in order over time, recognising the people who do good writing online is something I try to remember to do because the alternative is silence and silence rewards mediocrity unfortunately.
A nicely understated post that does not shout for attention, and a look at apkcontainer maintained the same quiet quality, understatement is a stylistic choice that distinguishes serious writing from attention seeking writing and this site has clearly committed to the understated approach as a core editorial value rather than just a phase.
Llevo casi medio ano en 888starz y la verdad entre con la mosca detras de la oreja, ya que en Espana uno se cansa de paginas que venden humo. Abrir la cuenta no me llevo ni tres minutos, correo, contrasena y listo, y el deposito minimo es de 1 euro, cosa que agradezco para tantear.
En cuanto a maquinas hay una barbaridad — andan por mas de 7.000 juegos de proveedores como Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Play’n GO, Betsoft y Yggdrasil. Mis habituales son Sweet Bonanza y Book of Dead, aunque de vez en cuando pruebo cosas de Big Time Gaming. La pega es que encontrar un juego concreto es un lio cuando tienes 8.000 cosas delante.
El casino en directo es de Evolution, basicamente y eso se nota: blackjack con gente real, Crazy Time y Monopoly Live para el que le guste el show. El bono de bienvenida ronda el 100% y unas 150 tiradas, con un rollover de x40, nada raro comparado con otros. Suele haber alguna promo sin deposito, conviene revisar las condiciones exactas directamente en [url=https://888starz-es2.com/app]download 888starz app[/url] antes de registrarte.
El tema de sacar pasta va bastante fino. Cobre hace poco con Skrill y me llego en menos de una hora. Con Visa se va a dos o tres dias, eso ya es cosa del banco. Tienen Neteller, Bitcoin y USDT y ahi es donde vuela de verdad.
En el telefono funciona bien, hay APK para Android pero yo uso el navegador y me sobra. El soporte te contesta en castellano, tardaron unos 10 minutos con una duda de documentacion. Licencia de Curazao, asi que no es un.es regulado y hay que saberlo antes de entrar. Yo sigo ahi, con sus cosas, aunque las promos hay que leerlas con lupa.
Highly recommend to anyone looking for a sensible take on this topic without the usual marketing nonsense, and a look at banehmagic kept that grounded approach going, sites that stay focused on serving readers rather than monetising every click are rare and this is clearly one of those rare ones I really appreciate finding.
Worth every minute of the time spent reading, and a stop at feb-en extends that value across more pages, in a media environment where most content is engineered to waste attention this site stands out by treating reader time as something valuable rather than something to be exploited and stretched as far as possible.
OK — been using this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d write something up since someone asked me a few days back. Am based in the UK, generally stick to footie and the horses, nothing mad, for context.
What got me on it was genuinely pretty stupid — I never could figure out what an each way return would be with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just guess and then be surprised. Now I type the odds in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.
Their single bet calculator is the bit I use most — type in stake and odds and it spits out profit and total return with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the multiples — acca and treble returns, a lucky 15, a yankee, honestly that’s where most people I know got it wrong. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/no-vig]no-vig[/url] — free, no signup.
What actually made a difference was the geekier bits. There’s an implied probability thing which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly tool — I use half kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutching one is handy too for when I’m covering two or three runners.
Not all sunshine though. The interface is very functional, let’s say — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it’s fine although the bigger tables are a squeeze. There’s no app, just the site — fine by me just flagging it.
So yeah. Costs nowt, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. Anyone who still works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.
Felt slightly impressed without being able to point to one specific reason, and a look at ThirtyMale continued that diffuse positive feeling, when content works at a level you cannot easily articulate the writer is doing something with craft rather than just delivering information and that is something I have learned to recognise.
Bookmark folder created specifically for this site, and a look at samsungfoundryforum confirmed the dedicated folder was the right call, dedicated folders for individual sites are a level of organisation I rarely deploy and this site has earned that level of dedicated tracking based on the consistency I have seen so far across sessions.
Right — have been messing about with this thing for about five months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, reckon I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m UK based, generally stick to footie and the horses, nothing mad, for context.
The reason I started using it was actually a bit daft — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an ew payout would be with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just guess and moan when the payout landed. Now type the odds in before every slip, even a straight one-selection punt.
Their single bet calculator tool is the one I open most — you drop in stake and odds and it spits out profit and total return instantly, fractions or decimals. Same tool covers the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, and that’s where most people I know mess it up. Have a go yourself, it’s here [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/lucky-15]ew lucky 15 calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.
One thing that actually shifted things for me is the geekier bits. There’s an odds-to-probability calculator that shows the overround, plus a kelly criterion calculator — I stick to fractional kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutching one is decent when I’m covering two or three runners.
It’s not perfect mind. Its design looks a bit basic — zero frills, it’s clearly function over form. On my phone it’s fine although the acca grid make you pinch and zoom. And no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me but worth saying.
Anyway. Free, barely any ads, does what it says. If anyone honestly works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saves me plenty of arguments with the bookie.
Liked that the post landed without needing to manufacture controversy or take a contrarian stance for attention, and a stop at shopthomasashbourne continued that grounded approach, content that earns attention through quality rather than provocation is the kind that builds long term trust rather than burning it on quick wins.
Took a chance on the headline and was rewarded, and a stop at dondatheverge kept the rewards coming as I clicked through, the kind of place where every link leads somewhere worth the click is a small luxury on the modern web where so many sites are mostly empty calories disguised as content.
Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at zavirotrustco extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.
Found the post genuinely useful for something I was working on this week, and a look at ulvirocore added more material I will reference, content that connects to my actual life and work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind I will pay attention to and return to repeatedly.
Right — have been messing about with this thing for something like four months now and I keep coming back, so thought I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m based in the UK, generally stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, so take it how you like.
How I found it was honestly pretty stupid — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an e/w return actually was with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just wing it and get a shock. Now I punch the numbers in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.
The single bet calculator is the bit I use most — you drop in the price and your stake and it shows profit and total return straight away, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the fiddly ones — trebles returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, which is where most people I know mess it up. If you want a look, it lives at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/odds-converter]odds converter sports[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.
What genuinely shifted things for me was the nerdier bits. The implied probability calculator that shows what margin’s baked in, and a kelly staking calculator — I use half kelly as the full version is terrifying. The dutch tool is handy too when I’m spreading across selections.
It’s not perfect mind. The layout looks pretty plain — zero polish, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. Phone-wise it’s fine although the acca grid make you pinch and zoom. Also there’s no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.
So yeah. Free, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. If anyone even now works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — it’s saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.
So — have been messing about with this thing for maybe five months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d write something up since someone asked me last week. Am based in the UK, mostly bet football and racing, nothing mad, for context.
What got me on it was honestly embarrassing — I could never figure out what an e/w payout would be once you get five places instead of three. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I punch the numbers in before every slip, even a straight one-selection punt.
The single bet calculator tool is the bit I use most — you put in stake and odds and it shows the return with no faffing, either odds format. There’s also the bigger stuff — trebles returns, a lucky 15, patents and yankees, and that’s where I always got it wrong. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/lucky-63]lucky 63 quotenrechner[/url] — free, no signup.
What genuinely shifted things for me is the more serious extras. They’ve got an probability thing that shows how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. The dutching one is decent if I’m covering two or three runners.
Not all sunshine though. Its layout looks a bit basic — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it’s usable though the lucky 63 breakdown make you pinch and zoom. There’s no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me but worth saying.
So yeah. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, does what it says. Anyone who still adds it up in their head, try it — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.
Appreciated how the post felt complete without overstaying its welcome, and a stop at OldSchoolOpen confirmed that economical approach runs across the site, knowing when to stop is a skill many writers never develop but here the discipline is obvious and welcome from the perspective of a busy reader trying to learn things efficiently.
Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at kazhanmaster kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.
So — been on this thing for something like six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so figured I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, mainly stick to footie and the horses, nothing mad, for context.
How I found it was genuinely embarrassing — I never could figure out what an each way payout actually was once you get five places instead of three. Basically I’d eyeball it and then be surprised. Now I punch the numbers in first, every time, even a simple single bet.
The single bet calculator is the bit I open most — you put in stake and odds and it shows returns instantly, either odds format. There’s also the bigger stuff — trebles returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, which is where most people I know got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/matched-betting]matched betting calc[/url] — free, no signup.
The thing that really made a difference is the more serious bits. They’ve got an probability converter which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly staking tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutch tool is handy too for when I’m splitting a race.
Couple of gripes. The interface looks pretty plain — no polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it works though the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. And no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — slight shame but you asked.
Anyway. Doesn’t cost anything, barely any ads, does the job. Anyone who still adds it up in their head, give it a go — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.
Thanks for the clean writing, no broken sentences and no awkward translations like some other sites have, and a quick stop at pelix kept that polish going nicely, it really does make a difference when a reader can move through a page without tripping on every line or going back to reread.
Better than most of the writing I have come across on this topic recently, simpler and more direct, and a look at premiumdigitalbuying continued in that same way, a real outlier in a crowded space full of repetitive content that says little while taking up a lot of reader time today which is unfortunate.
Great work on keeping things readable, the post never drags or repeats itself which I really appreciate, and a stop at ulviroline added a bit more context that fit naturally with what was already said here, no need to read everything twice to get the point being made today.
This stands out compared to similar posts I have read recently, less noise and more substance, and a look at maverotrustline kept that gap going, you can really feel the difference between content made by someone who cares versus content made to fill a publishing schedule for an algorithm trying to keep growing somehow.
Worth flagging that the writing rewarded a second read more than I expected, and a look at nolarobond produced the same second read benefit, content with hidden depths that emerge only on careful rereading is rare in the modern blog space and this site has clearly invested in that level of compositional density throughout.
Now adding this to a list of sites I want to see flourish, and a stop at HanaCapeCoral reinforced that wish, the few sites I actively root for are sites that produce the kind of work I want more of in the world and this one has joined that small list based on what I have read so far.
So — been on this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d write something up since a mate asked me a few days back. Am in the UK, generally bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, for context.
What got me on it was honestly pretty stupid — I never could work out what an each way payout would be when the place terms changed. Basically I’d eyeball it and moan when the payout landed. Now I type the odds in before every slip, even a simple single bet.
The single bet calculator tool is the bit I’m on daily — type in your stake, the odds and you get the return straight away, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the multiples — trebles returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, yankees, honestly that’s where I always lose track. Have a go yourself, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/odds-converter]bookies odds converter[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.
One thing that really made a difference is the nerdier bits. There’s an odds-to-probability converter and it makes obvious what margin’s baked in, and there’s the kelly criterion calculator — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutching one gets used a fair bit when I’m spreading across selections.
Couple of gripes. The design looks very functional, let’s say — not much polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works although the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s nothing on the app store, it’s a website and that’s it — slight shame just flagging it.
Anyway. Free, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. If you still does the maths on paper, have a look — saves me a fair few dumb bets I’d have regretted.
Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at zylavocapital kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.
So — been using this thing for maybe six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so figured I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m UK based, mostly bet football and racing, nothing mad, just so you know where I’m coming from.
How I found it was actually embarrassing — I could never work out what an ew return would be when the place terms changed. I’d just guess and get a shock. These days I punch the numbers in before every slip, even the boring singles.
The single bet calculator tool is the part I use most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it shows profit and total return with no faffing, either odds format. Same tool covers the multiples — trebles maths, a lucky 15, patents and yankees, and that’s where I always lose track. If you want a look, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/yankee]irish lottery yankee bet calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.
The thing that actually made a difference is the geekier tools. There’s an odds-to-probability converter and it makes obvious what margin’s baked in, and there’s the kelly calculator — I use half kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit for when I’m splitting a race.
It’s not perfect mind. Its interface is a bit basic — zero flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it’s fine although the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no proper app, just the site — doesn’t bother me but worth saying.
Right, that’s me. Free, not plastered in adverts, does the job. Anyone who even now does the maths on paper, have a look — saves me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.
Strong recommendation from me, anyone curious about the topic should make time for this, and a look at sega-live only sharpens that recommendation further, the kind of resource that holds up against careful scrutiny rather than crumbling at the first critical question is rare and worth pointing other people toward when the topic comes up.
Genuinely well crafted writing, the kind that makes the topic look easier than it actually is, and a look at ulvionbond added even more depth, you can feel the experience behind every line which is something only writers who have been at this for a while can pull off with this level of grace.
Right — been on this thing for something like five months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so figured I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m UK based, generally bet football and racing, nothing mad, for context.
The reason I started using it was genuinely pretty stupid — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an e/w return actually was when the place terms changed. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. These days I punch the numbers in before every slip, even a simple single bet.
Their single bet calculator is the bit I use most — you put in stake and odds and you get returns straight away, either odds format. Same tool covers the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, which is where I always mess it up. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/matched-betting]free match betting calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.
One thing that actually made a difference is the more serious tools. The probability thing and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly criterion calculator — I stick to fractional kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. Dutching calculator is handy too when I’m covering two or three runners.
Not all sunshine though. The design is a bit basic — no frills, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it works but the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. There’s nothing on the app store, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me just flagging it.
Anyway. Free, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. If you even now adds it up in their head, have a look — saves me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.
Reading this with a notebook open turned out to be the right move, and a stop at longtermbusinesspartnerships added more material to the notes, content that justifies active note taking from a passive reader is content with real informational density and this site is producing notes worthy material at a high rate consistently.
Right — have been messing about with this thing for about a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me the other day. Am UK based, mostly do football and horses, nothing mad, so take it how you like.
How I found it was actually a bit daft — I could never get my head round what an e/w payout actually was when the place terms changed. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. Now punch the numbers in before every slip, even a simple single bet.
Their single bet calculator tool is the bit I open most — you drop in stake and odds and it shows returns straight away, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. It also handles the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, yankees, honestly that’s where I’d always lose track. Have a go yourself, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/kelly-criterion]half kelly calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.
The thing that actually changed how I bet was the nerdier extras. There’s an probability calculator which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly staking tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are a quick route to a dead bankroll. Dutching calculator gets used a fair bit for when I’m spreading across selections.
It’s not perfect mind. Its interface looks a bit basic — not much polish, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s usable but the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. There’s no proper app, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.
Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, works. If anyone still works out returns on a calculator app, try it — saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.
Came away with a slightly better mental model of the topic than I started with, and a stop at almostfashionablemovie sharpened that further, content that improves the reader thinking apparatus rather than just dumping facts into it is the rare kind I genuinely value and seek out when I have time to read carefully.
Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I am going to revisit once again since i have book-marked it.
Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich
and continue to help other people.
Picked this up between two other things I was doing and got drawn in completely, and after zz-meta my original tasks were completely forgotten for a while, content that derails a workflow in a positive way by being more interesting than what you were already doing is rare and worth recognising clearly.
Right — been using this thing for maybe six months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so thought I’d chuck my thoughts in since a mate asked me a few days back. Am UK based, generally bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, just so you know where I’m coming from.
How I found it was actually a bit daft — I never could get my head round what an e/w payout would be when the place terms changed. I used to just guess and get a shock. Now punch the numbers in before every slip, even a simple single bet.
Their single bet calculator is the one I open most — you put in the price and your stake and it spits out profit and total return straight away, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, and that’s where I always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/odds-converter]european odds converter[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.
The thing that really changed how I bet were the more serious extras. The odds-to-probability thing and it makes obvious the overround, and there’s the kelly staking calculator — I run quarter kelly because full kelly is a quick route to a dead bankroll. Dutching calculator is handy too for when I’m spreading across selections.
Not all sunshine though. The layout feels very functional, let’s say — zero polish, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s usable but the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no app, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.
So yeah. Free, no ads shoved in your face, does what it says. If you even now works out returns on a calculator app, try it — it’s saved me plenty of dumb bets I’d have regretted.
Just sat with this for a bit longer than I usually would because the points are worth thinking about, and after qelarobond I had even more to chew on, the kind of post that nudges your thinking forward without forcing the issue is something I have always appreciated in good writing online.
Liked that the post resisted a sales pitch ending, and a stop at cnsbiodesk maintained the no pitch approach, content that ends without trying to convert me into a customer or subscriber is content that has confidence in its own value and this site is clearly playing the long game on reader trust.